By 
The ratification of suspension of Barrister Joyce Oduah as Secretary General of the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, by the National Executive Council of the association has been described as not only an affront to the Court but a denigration of the sanctity of the judiciary which on several occasions had been condemned by the Supreme Court of Nigeria.
Justice Ahmed Ramat Mohammed of the Federal High Court in Abuja, while ruling in an application filed and argued by Ayotunde Ogunleye on behalf of the plaintiff, held that the NBA’s NEC which gave legal effect to
the suspension of the plaintiff acted in bad faith and in utter disregard to the proceedings of the court.
The Judge agreed with Ogunleye that the ratification done on August 21 ought not to have been carried out by the NEC in view of the pendency of a suit challenging the suspension in the first instance.
Justice Mohammed also agreed with the plaintiff’s counsel that the purported Ratification was not only an affront to the Court but a denigration of the sanctity of the judiciary which on several occasions had been condemned by the Supreme Court of Nigeria.
Ogunleye had in his application drawn the attention of the Court to the effect that the out-going President of the NBA, Olumide Akpata who is 2nd defendant in the suit against the suspension presided over the August 21 meeting of NBA’S NEC where the purported Ratification was carried out.
Ogunleye cited Supreme Court authorities to establish that the Olumide Akpata led National Committee acted against the established law in taking steps in a matter pending against them adding that the purported Ratification was a deliberate and desperate ploy to foist helplessness on the court.
He urged the court to condemn the Council for resorting to self-help in a suit being adjudicated upon by a law court.
Justice Mohammed agreed that having submitted to court jurisdiction, joined issues with the plaintiff in court and with or without express order of court, no party ought to have taken any further steps on the subject matter of the litigation.
The Judge said that the action of the NBA’S Council in relation to the unlawful ratification was irritating, annoying, condemnable and liable to be set aside since the actors in the illegal ratification cannot claim ignor
The National Executive Committee of the NBA led by Olumide Akpata had on August 15, 2022 suspended the General Secretary pending ratification by NBA’S NEC for final removal from office.
Nine out of eleven officers who signed the resolution authorizing the suspension also referred Mrs Oduah to the NBA’S NEC for disciplinary action and for removal from office for alleged gross misconduct.
However, while the NBA’S NEC ratified the suspension, it declined to ratify recommendation for removal of the plaintiff from office on the ground of her subsisting legal action against the suspension.
A Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Godwin Onuakwu had made spirited efforts to justify the ratification on the ground that the NBA’S NEC only acted on a completed act.
He urged the court not to hold that the action of the NBA’S NEC amounted to self help or attempts to foist a siyuation of hopelessness on the court because the suspension can be voided and set aside by the if merit is found in the case of the plaintiff.
Justice Mohammed however disagreed with the senior lawyer on the ground that the action of the NBA’S NEC was a direct attack against the court and must not be allowed to stand.
The Judge particularly noted that the action of the NBA’S NEC members was painful because all of them are legal practitioners.
The court thereafter fixed August 31 for hearing in a motion on notice seeking mandatory order of injunction against the defendants in the suit.
Comments